Comic Book Journal

Batman in Barcelona: Dragon’s Knight #1, is a one-shot by Mark Waid and Diego Olmos which takes Bruce Wayne with Batman in tow to Barcelona to find and destroy Killer Croc. As coincidence would have it, he must confront the killer at the festival of St. George. The one-shot while mildly entertaining, is just that, mildly entertaining. The book, which tells a great story does not make any strides for the future. It doesn’t establish any sort of precedent nor lead into any other story arcs. It’s old-fashioned stand-alone storytelling, which Waid does wonderfully, to his credit. Also, the art is decent. The cover by Jim Lee looks, as always, amazing, but the interior art was just okay. It looked great for the first half of the book, solid and detailed, through the middle though, the artist lost steam, and the artwork became half-hearted and lackluster. With this type of minimal effort put forth, I’d give this issue a six out of ten. It could have been better, but ended up just alright. For more fantastic reviews see http://www.comicbookjournal.net/category/reviews/

In the preview to Blackest Night we see Green Lantern and the Flash wax philosophocial about the death of Batman. It shows the dual side to Bruce Wayne’s nature, as he was Hal Jordan’s best friend at times then at times, worst enemy. This issue serves as a phonemonial prologue to what is sure to be a highly entertaining series. It will be interesting to see who, if anyone else,rises from the grave. I cannot say enough about Ivan Reis’s artwork. His style is a wonderful throwback and reminescent of the highly stylized and detailed art from, in particular, Neal Adams in the 1970s. Reis is the modern version and his art is dynamic, detailed, and a joy to look at. I think he should be allowed to draw every DC book, or if contracted through Marvel, every Marvel book. Geoff Johns direction with Hal Jordan is getting to be legendary and I can’t wait to see what he has in store for the Lantern with this arc. On a scale of one to ten, I’d give this a solid ten out of ten. I’m hooked and can’t wait for the graphic novel. For more reviews see http://www.comicbookjournal.net/category/reviews/

Batman Confidential #29 by Andrew Kreisberg and Scott McDaniel is a spirited story introducing a former good cop who goes to Arkham, meets the Joker, then becomes a bad cop and starts killing other cops at the Gotham City Police Department. This is at least a two-part story so there is no definitive ending, but with this type of scripting, I’d like to actually finish it up. What I like about reading this issue is it flowed like the older Batman animated series cartoons, plenty of mystery and adventure to keep the pages turning. The only thing I didn’t enjoy so much in the story was McDaniel’s artwork. If DC were indeed trying for that animated feel, then it works, if not, well they missed their mark by pairing this duo together. McDaniel’s pencils are skilled, don’t get me wrong, but the style and feature exaggerations, in my opinion do not belong in a Batman book, and never have. Personally I feel Batman should be drawn as Neal Adams did wonderfully in his hayday. Batman should be bold, crisp, dark, and above all else–detailed. On a whole the issue was a good outing for the Batman pile. I’d have to give this one a solid seven out of ten for effort more than anything. For more reviews see http://www.comicbookjournal.net/category/reviews/

I’m sitting here was a stack of comics to review (some old, some new) and I’m anxiously awaiting the task of adding a few more to the pile after May 2nd. For those who do not know, Saturday, May 1st is Free Comic Book day, which launches nicely after the kickoff of the summer movie frenzy. Looks like there’s going to be some good ones this year, stay tuned for my review of X-Men Origins: Wolverine as soon as it opens. It’s going to be a scorcher. This year’s FCBD goodies also look mighty fine was plenty of titles to choose from. What I like most about Free Comic Book Day is it gives many people with no background in the comic book industry a chance to see what variety there is in the field and also it gives us die hard comic book geeks a chance to get out of the basement and into the spotlight. To help you gear up for the festivities I’ve compiled a list of titles out there. Also the one marked indicate a “gold” title, which means it’s pretty limited and could be hard to find, depending on how many titles your retailer has ordered from the publishers. So without further ado here’s the list:

• Archie Comics: Archie Presents: The Mighty Archie Art Players

• BOOM! Studios: Disney/Pixar’s Cars

• Bongo Comics: 2009 Free For All

• Dark Horse Comics: Star Wars: Clone Wars

• DC Comics: Blackest Night #0

• IDW Publishing: Transformers Animated/G.I. Joe

• Image Comics: Savage Dragon #148

• Oni Press: Resurrection #0

• Marvel Comics: The Avengers

• Viz Media: Shonen Jump Presents: Ultimo

Dark Horse Comics: Aliens/Predator

APE: Cartoonapalooza #2

Aracana Studio Presents

Atomic Robo And Friends

Attack Of The Alterna-Zombies!

Comics Festival! 2009 Volume 3

Contract #1

Cyberforce/Hunter-Killer Preview

Dabel Bros. Showcase

DC Kids Mega Sampler

FCHS

Fist Of Justice #1

Gold Digger #101/Prince Of Heroes

IMPACT University Volume 5

Love & Capes

Love & Rockets Sampler

Mercy Sparx: Under New Management

Nancy & Melvin Monster

NASCAR Heroes: Origins #1

Owly And Friends

Radical 2009 Preview

Sonic The Hedgehog: Evolution Of A Hero

Studio 407 Sampler

The Stuff of Legend

The Wizard Hot List

TMNT #1 25th Anniversary Reprint

Warhammer Fantasy

William Shatner Presents #1

Wolverine: Origin Of An X-Man

Worlds Of Aspen #4

I predict that of these titles the biggest sleeper hits will be Green Lantern: Blackest Night, which will shake up the DC Universe a bit. I’m a bit partial I’ve always been a big Green Lantern fan.

Also check out Shatner’s latest offering, with the upcoming Star Trek film I’d imagine a little Kirk nostalgia will likely drive sales of his upcoming title.

A pile of reviews will be coming tomorrow and also Saturday I’ll have the claws out for Wolverine! Be there at www.comicbookjournal.net

I’m still believing in this series. X-Files #4, finishes up an arc involving Wilson Chan, a businessman, with some dark links to his heritage and a covert dynasty still in operation. For a past issue review see my post at http://www.comicbookjournal.net/i-want-to-believe/. This series has serious potential to be one of the biggest sleeper hits of 2009. I’m not just saying this as an X-Files fan, but also as a comic book fan, and someone who has a taste for great fiction. The team of Wolfman and Denham are hot. Marv Wolfman’s plot connected all the dots on this issue as his characterizations are true to the series and he ties up all loose ends in the mystery as well, without relying on a deux-ex-machina to just end the plot without making any explanations. Denham’s pencils are fantastic and he, unlike, some previous artists on the Topps series from a few years back, actual draws the likeness of both Scully and Mulder extremely well. It is clear he takes his time with the pencils and adds his own twist using different “camera” angles to make his storytelling dynamic and dramatic. Wildstorm has a hit in the making with this series, which really has limitless possibilities in dealing with a television universe, that was practically limitless as well. Now, this series will not appeal to fans of the traditional superhero book. There are no flashy costumes, no over-the-top evil-doers, or even any mention of saving the world. I’d recommend this for any Dark Horse or Vertigo fan. Since it won’t appeal to everyone, I’d have to give this book a nine out of ten, the only flaw really, is some readers who have never viewed the series or like this type of story might feel a little out of the loop.

I finally went to go see Watchmen and the end is nigh because the movie is better than the graphic novel. Now, don’t get me wrong the graphic novel was groundbreaking in numerous ways, but I never thought it would be the be-all-end-all of narrative storytelling in the industry. Yes, it was long and I think probably about twenty minutes could have been cut out without giving up any essential story, but it was almost three solid hours of pure engagement. What I liked most about the film, is even though it was a wonderful retelling Zach Snyder’s scene selection. He found a way to incorporate all the irony and emotion from Moore’s story into film and keep me engaged throughout. Sure, some purists will hate the flick because of the altered ending, but come on, do we really have to see the monster to get the point? Snyder trusts his audience will make the leap and form their own conclusions concerning the “monster” that society itself has become.

Let’s be clear, the film would not have worked it bigger A-listers had been cast as any of the characters. These actors and actresses did an excellent job and their performances could be oscar fodder. They did not overact and did a solid job interpreting the material. That’s what makes Watchmen as a film work. They do not just play men and women in capes and suits, they really internalize the written word and each did a fantastic job bringing life to these ‘everyman’ heroes.

Bear in mind, though this is not a movie to take the children too. Just because there are costumed heroes, does not mean this is an all-ages film. This movie, as well as the graphic novel, is intended for an adult audience only.

Here’s the bottom line: Watchmen is an extraordinary film of substance, but die hard purists and Moore followers might not enjoy it as much. On a scale of one to ten I’d give this one a solid nine and a half of ten. Go see this movie not because it’s comic book related, but because the story is still culturally important. For more comments on the movie see the prequel to this post at http://www.comicbookjournal.net/who-watches-the-watchmen-2/

Let the debate begin. Let me clarify I have not watched The Watchmen yet. Why? Fear. Nothing but unabashed fear that it will be nearly three hours of my life wasted. From the trailers I believe I might be right. I have, however, taken some time to look at a different type of adaptation: The Watchmen motion comic. At first I was intrigued. I thought why this is genius why haven’t more companies authorized this type of media onslaught yet. Then as the story progressed, I realized why. Comic books are not meant to be animated, especially in this narrative story. Maybe it would have been better for DC just to bite the bullet and let some anime company buy the rights and make a feature-length movie. I’m not saying the motion comic was entirely bad, it was an original twist on an old concept but it will never, I repeat, never replace the tried and true method of actually reading a comic book, or if you prefer, graphic novel. The voice acting was just ok, but the music was predictable and somewhat of a distraction. I like to create my own soundtrack in my head when reading a comic book. In short, if you’re really bored and have few hours to kill go ahead and watch it, otherwise just pretend you did. I’d give the motion comic a five out of ten. To read the official movie review see http://www.popculturebuzz.com/movie-review-watchmen/

Well, I’m just finished reading a title I think could in the running for worst of 2008. The Ambush Bug limited series #4 of 6. Sigh. Let’s see where do we begin? Hmm. Let me start by saying ( to much probable disapproval) Keith Giffen’s fifteen minutes of fame are up. They ended with Lobo, which in turn should have been the end of comic books making fun of themselves. I don’t like tongue-in-cheek stories, which could be the reason I didn’t like this issue in particular. I also don’t like the genre poking fun at the medium itself or the creators. I think enough “mainstream” critics and reviewers already simplify the material enough and turn new readers away from established titles. So there’s my two sense on that particular topic. If you enjoy this type of story then Ambush Bug might just be for you. I thought the storyiine was weak, and extremely silly and also over-the-top. On the plus side, however, the art did match the tone and pacing of the story well and the colorist, in particular should be commended for giving the issue that gooey pulp flavor, which is unusual to see in a quite modern work. All in all, I’m giving this book a five out of ten. One word can describe it. Mediocre. For some folks who know things about real life bugs check on the science and nature blogs at http://www.dailysciencedose.com/water-water-not-anywhere-nor-any-drop-to-drinkin-2050/.

The truth is out there, or should I say at Wildstorm. I was highly anticipating the release of the X-Files #1 from Wildstorm, as I was a HUGE fan of the show and also a monthly reader of the Topps series a few years back. So how do you compare oranges to oranges? Why their taste of course. See, the Topps series, despite its honest attempts to match the atmosphere of the show, always seemed to fall flat, with the art being at times goofy and the writing to seem forced. The Wildstorm series is quite the opposite. From opening “credits” to ending cliffhanger Spotnitz’s writing is dead on, as it should be since he worked on the series. The art is equally matched, though. This was a pleasant surprise. From the deadpan expressions of Mulder, to the annoyed looks from Skinner, and even the dead on accuracy of the Lone Gunmen (see below), it was a joy to read. I want to believe in this series. And this is a good start for anyone, whether a fan of the show or not. This could possibly be the title that launches Wildstorm back into the limelight of the comics world and also back into the top sellers list. I’m anxious to see how this one fares. One my scale I’d give this one a solid 9 of 10. This one’s a buy. Also if you want to see the trailer for the newly-released movie sequel, hop on over to http://www.popculturebuzz.com/the-x-files-i-want-to-believe-movie-trailer-is-awesome/

It feels good to write this review. I feel like DC has taken a step toward pure storytelling again with this hardcover. I’d give it a solid seven out of ten. The most refreshing thing about this Joker story, which has many similarities to Heath Ledger’s performance, is Batman only makes one appearance. At the end of the story. Azzarello’s approach to the plot, with having a third party viewing Joker’s actions and attempt to rationalize his won behavior creates a unique character dynamic which works. It was flawless and seamless until the end. I think the end of the tale came later than which it should have, though. It felt as if it could have ended about twenty pages sooner than what it did. However, when read in multiple sittings, though I don’t think it would make any difference to the overall effect. It felt at times like Gotham City meets T.S. Elliot’s The Wasteland. Check out a great literature page at http://www.thebookstacks.com/guest-karen-white-author-of-the-house-on-tradd-street/ for more great literature links. Now for my favorite part–the art. Lee Bremejo’s work is detailed, hypnotic and fascinating. His pacing, scene selection, and even backgrounds are superb. It is detailed, gritty, and atmospheric, a perfect companion to Azzarello’s nuanced plot. Way to go DC this dynamic duo is a knockout!

In my previous post I anticipated the comic book event the release of The Dark Knight, see my post at http://www.comicbookjournal.net/death-of-the-joker/ for the prequel to this post. I finally viewed the film and it far surpassed my expectations of not just a comic book movie, but a movie in general. I was relieved to see that Legendary Films did apparently little to edit Heath Ledger’s final finished performance, and it was a masterpiece for a finale. Ledger steals the show so to speak as his Joker far surpasses even that of Jack Nicholson. Go see this movie! It will change the way you see comic book movies, and even Batman as well. My only complaint with the film is it is a tad long, but I think Chris Nolan intentionally left action sequences linger to display the new technology he had to work with, especially the introduction into an imax camera for some extended scenes. July was an exciting month in the comics world with the release of the Dark Knight, an expanded trailer for Watchmen in 2009, Comic Con, and of course, some exciting solicitations for August and September. I’ll have part two of my July wrap up tomorrow posted and hopefully some in-depth convention announcement coverage and even perhaps some reviews. Who has time to read anymore? Smile, Why so serious?!

With the release of The Incredible Hulk Marvel Studios has cemented its place within Hollywood as a major contender and also silenced critics who thought that one superhero blockbuster was not possible–yet alone two back to back. Riding the success of Iron Man, the Hulk, whether loathed or loved was at least a financial windfall for Marvel who plans to release more titles in the future with the possibility of Captain America. The Hulk has already made over 54.5 million dollars in its first week. So DC now has to up the ante to compete with Marvel in film. The release of The Dark Knight on July 18th is a good starting point.

So why are comic book movies so compelling and successful this summer. I think that has to do more with the state of the nation than stories alone. Sure, they are all fairly entertaining, but can you think of any other vacation day that you spend less than going to the movies? With gas prices skyrocketing no one is going anywhere, The movies are local, affordable, and does provide that sense of escape that travel often does. What else are portable, affordable, and provides entertainment and escapism–comic books. Comic books plus movies equals summer vacation family fun that’s entertaining and inexpensive. Now is the time for the industry to really boom again and if publishers can capitalize on the market at this time, they could rebuild a loyal fan base for generations to come.

That’s this blogger’s view. With the economy being in its current state, it’s important for everyone to try to contribute to the health of the environment to use less expensive fuel and maintain the health of the planet. That’s why I’m going to have a bit of a contest. I have a comic book collection. I do not read all the titles I have every day. So I’m looking for some inventive ways to recycle my old comics. For the person who can come up with the most creative and original way to recycle or use old comic books will win–you guessed it, a HUGE stack of my old comics. Some could be valuable, some may not. They’re really not organized nor in alphabetical order. I’ll leave that to you. I’m running this contest until the July 4th, so put on your thinking caps. I’ll link to this post every so often for a reminder, and as always leave comments or send emails for entries.

Looking for cool things to customize your ride this summer check this out: http://www.comicbookjournal.net/top-ten-comic-book-auto-accessories/

Ok. For starters, I don’t know all that much about the character of the Atom, just that DC has relaunched the title before, so how does this fairly reincarnation stack up? With this title, DC might have also reinvented classic sci-fi in comics. The story was engaging, and the plot fast-paced throughout. The scripting and dialogue was also tight and Rick Remender’s use of caption drew me into the story. This dynamic interaction between written word and reader erased the fourth wall, leading to a thoroughly enjoyable read. Also–the art. Kudos to Pat Olliffe. The panels, the cover, the splash page, the detail, and the backgrounds, all virtually flawless. His style meshes perfectly with this genre as well, at times I felt I was reading a vintage pulp as the clear joy the artist has while drawing seems to seep through the pencils and inks. The only flaw I have with this book, and as I do with many runs on a series, is the lack of character introduction and a “previously” section in the beginning. With that said, I’d have to give thie book a solid nine out of ten. DC has stepped up their game, especially in sci-fi. Do they have any competition? I guess we’ll see, huh? For the skinny on other DC titles, see my recent review of the Action Comics annual at http://www.comicbookjournal.net/action-comics-annual-11/

In the not-so-distant past I reviewed an Action Comics annual didn’t I? Time flies when you’re having fun. Well this year’s annual wasn’t as light-hearted, nor attractive to new readers I fear. Here’s the scoop. That ne’er do well General Zod escaped from the Phantom Zone once again and it’s up to Kal-El, Last Son of Krypton, to save the world from the Kryptonian invasion. The twist at the end is, however, that lovable scamp, Christopher Kent saves the day instead, sacrificing himself into the Phantom Zone to save Earth. This issue is much darker than last year’s annual, and the story is more poignant then fun. Clark laments the fact he cannot bear children with Lois, and Lex Luthor falls deeper into madness, feeling invalidated by not receiving recognition in his part to design the weapons to take out Zod. All in all, I’d have to give this issue a xix out of ten (which to my recollection is what I gave the last annual) The story, with the exception of the biographies in the back, is not really a great jumping on point for new readers. While Richard Donner and Geoff Johns create a fairly good story about Superman’s heritage versus his role on Earth, it’s just all a little…depressing for an annual. On the plus side Adam Kubert’s artwork is outstanding and his different panel viewpoints and camera angles make for a visually compelling read. I’d recommend this title for Superman enthusiasts or completists only though. Novice readers I fear, won’t have much to connect with. Who’s funnier than Jerry Seinfeld? Practically no one. Who’s mightier than Superman? Practically no one. What do you get when you pair the two together? No kids, it’s not a credit card commercial. It’s that really cool page I found with the Superman references in Seinfeld. Here’s the link. Check it out. http://www.comicbookjournal.net/calling-all-superfriends/

I have to start by apologizing to Steve Niles, last week I did incorrectly site him as the author of the Marvel Knights revamp of Frank Castle, the Punisher. The title I was referring to was the Punisher:Purgatory and it was written by fan favorite, Christopher Golden, and drawn by Bernie Wrightson. As you know he is one of my favorite artists, which was more than likely the reason I picked up the book to start with. So I do extend my apologies to Steve Niles. I was correct on Steve’s ability to write a great horror comic though, so for all of you not paying attention the first time, here’s the link to my review of Simon Dark:http://www.comicbookjournal.net/simon-dark-5/.
It’s good stuff! Now, as a blogger, I confess I don’t have a spell checker, grammar checker, fact checker, or even an entourage. So comments like this are always appreciated and if I mess up or if you have any questions or comments please feel free to share. Like I said last week, I always read every comment, even if I don’t respond. So about that entourage any volunteers….
If you enjoy reading comic book journal and wants to continue to see it grow show some support and use Smilebox to put a little more animation in your blogs and emails. It’s easy to use and fun to share. Blog your photos & videos using Smilebox“>Smilebox
.

Stay tuned for more reviews!